With the development of technology and surgical techniques, FUT is no longer relevant in modern clinics. Among the various methods used, Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT) was once widely popular, but now the use of this method will speak more about the incompetence of the clinic and play as anti-advertising for the doctor.
Evolution of Hair Transplant Surgery
The first documented attempt at hair transplantation was performed by Dr. Okuda in Japan in 1939, using punch grafts to treat scars and burn injuries.
In the 1980s, mini-grafts and micro-grafts were introduced, which involved using smaller grafts with one to three hair follicles. The need for a better solution with minimal scarring and improved outcomes led to the development of Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT) in the 1990s.
FUT, also known as the “strip” method, involved removing a strip of skin from the donor area, which was then dissected into individual follicular units containing one to four hairs. These follicular units are then transplanted to the recipient area. FUT gained popularity and became the dominant method of hair transplant surgery in the 1990s and early 2000s.
However, with the advent of Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) in the late 1990s and early 2000s, hair transplant surgery underwent another significant transformation. FUE involved extracting individual follicular units directly from the donor area using a punch-like tool, without the need for a strip of skin to be removed. This resulted in smaller, circular scars that were less noticeable and a faster recovery time compared to FUT.
FUE also allowed for more flexibility in hair transplantation, as follicular units could be extracted from various areas of the body, such as the beard, eyebrows, and body hair, which was not possible with FUT.
The field of hair transplant surgery has evolved significantly over the years. While FUT was once the go-to method for hair transplant surgery, it has been largely overshadowed by FUE in modern clinics.
The advancements in technology have played a significant role in the declining relevance of FUT in modern clinics. Robotic hair transplant systems, for example, have revolutionized the field of hair transplant surgery. These systems use sophisticated algorithms and artificial intelligence to precisely extract and transplant hair follicles, resulting in more accurate and consistent outcomes. The use of specialized tools, such as micro-punches of various sizes, has also improved the efficiency and precision of FUE, making it a more viable option for modern clinics.
These technological advancements have made other hair transplantation techniques more efficient, accurate, and reproducible, reducing the need for FUT. With robotic assistance and specialized tools, hair transplant surgeons can now extract and transplant hair follicles with higher precision, resulting in the natural-looking results that patients desire. These advancements have also allowed for more flexibility in hair transplantation, enabling surgeons to perform transplantation in various areas of the body, including the beard, eyebrows, and even body hair, which was previously challenging with FUT.
Patient Preferences and Expectations
Another important factor in the declining relevance of FUT in modern clinics is the changing preferences and expectations of patients. Patients nowadays are more informed and have higher expectations when it comes to the results of their hair transplant surgeries. They often prioritize minimal scarring, quicker recovery, and natural-looking results, which are better fulfilled by FUE.
The absence of a linear scar and faster healing time associated with FUE makes it a more appealing option for patients who want to return to their daily activities sooner. The ability to achieve natural-looking results with FUE is also a significant advantage, as patients seek hair transplant procedures that produce natural-looking outcomes that blend seamlessly with their existing hair.
Surgeon Training and Expertise:
The training and expertise of hair transplant surgeons also play a role in the declining relevance of FUT in modern clinics. With the increasing popularity of FUE, many hair transplant surgeons are now trained in FUE techniques and may have limited experience or expertise in performing FUT. This shift in training and practice has further reduced the need for FUT in modern clinics.
FUE and DHI techniques require a higher level of technical skill and precision, and surgeons need to undergo specialized training programs, gain hands-on experience, and continuously update their knowledge to deliver optimal outcomes. Patients are increasingly seeking highly skilled and experienced surgeons who can provide natural-looking results with minimal scarring and faster recovery times. As a result, the expertise of the surgeon is considered a crucial element in the decision-making process for both patients and clinics, leading to the reduced popularity of FUT.